1965 AMC Rambler Marlin
AMC Scene
Typical of all of humankind's works upon this planet earth, the 1965 AMC Rambler Marlin is not a perfect car; there is no perfect car! A perfect car would run forever. The next best goal is to make a car "built to last" and make it easy to service; a key element helping to keep the AMC car hobby afloat.
One of the worst characteristics of the Rambler Marlin is the quality of information; misinformation, disinformation and wrong information steals the stage most of the time. Confusion about the Marlin is linked to AMC cars in general, and AMC products have always suffered smearing write ups by biased non-enthusiasts. The weird thing is, many AMC enthusiasts seem to enjoy echoing the smearing remarks... for lack of any other information; no information. The disinformation wars within the US auto industry have ultimately backfired (the Studebaker people have actual documentation), leading the average American citizen to believe all US built cars are inferior to foreign made cars. Generally speaking, the majority of AMC enthusiasts exibit a mild form of what is explained in psychology as "rooting for the underdog" complex. This is where the person feels an entity is wrongfully mistreated and at first seeks to relieve it, but in time acquires a taste to enjoy the suffering instead. I call this "AMC disease", it's a mild form of sadomasochism. Many AMCers seem to enjoy fussing about trivial matters concerning the cars and even perpetuating the old biased, or even false, information written about the products. But notice how the Chevy people don't perpetuate the smearing remarks about the Vega's engine; they simply put forth good information on how to swap in a better Chevrolet engine. Notice how Ford enthusiasts don't whine about the Mustang's hinting side scoops for the teaser mid engine prototype, or how the crudely styled '65 hood does not fit the grille... and how 'bout them highly engineered surface mount tail lamps? Still, no whining; simply healthy enthusiasm. Whereas it seems heretical for most writers not to describe the Rambler Marlin with discretely plaigerized smears, as if they would lose their credibility. Apparently it is universally enjoyed to deride and heckle AMC products without much if any at all personal experience with them and this in turn is a sad reflection of our "modern Christian society". Fact is, -in Truth- AMC cars compare well to their competition, having some superior features not fully matched, having other features considered to be inferior quality... just like the other auto makers of imperfect cars!
Marlin Drivetrain
The '65 Marlin had a optional overdrive transmission. The console mounted "Twin-Stick" can be shifted as a 5spd; from 1rst to 2nd, to 2nd+OD, to 3rd, to 3rd+OD. AMC did't degenerate down to a 2spd automatic in the '60s, but rather offered the Borg-Warner M8/10 3spd automatic with a modified valve body; select "D2"-the tranny is a 2spd, select "D1"-the tranny is a 3spd. Not so commonly known is a method for manually shifting the automatic; placing the selector in "L" for first gear will hold first with no upshift, waiting until engine rpms wind up high for maximum power, move the gear shift selector momentarily out of "L" and back again to find second gear with no upshift. This way, "L" serves to provide first and second with no upshift.
Perhaps the best Marlin feature is the sturdy AMC inline 6 or Rambler V8 engine:
No doubt because of AMC's success with Jeep Corporation and the public becoming much endeared and familiar with those products, tons of good information is available for the legendary 7 main bearing AMC inline six; a 2bbl 232 I6 was the base engine for the Marlin that provides good street torque and about 23 mpg puttn' around town.
The Rambler V8 is largely unknown. This was AMC's first non-inline engine. At first glance it looks much like the Studebaker V8. Non-AMC enthusiasts typically want to call it a "big block", but the large size look is from the generous water jacketing for ensured cooling and durability. Actually it's only 26lbs. heavier than a "small block" Chevrolet motor. (601 vs. 575lbs) The cast nodular iron block is a combination of Nash, Hudson and Kaiser engineering. There are three displacements; 250, 287 and 327 versions. Most Marlins came with the 270hp, 9.7 to 1 compression 4bbl 327.
The Marlin pictured here was weighed at Sacramento Dragway; 3425 lbs. thus this car has a power to weight ratio of 12.68 lbs. to every 1 hp, just a tad over the 12 to 1 standard for a "true musclecar". This car ran a best time of 16.43 @ 89 mph, having my poor reaction time at the tree, running it's tired un-rebuilt "floodwater special" stock 327 engine. (Argh; this time is faster than the magazines said the car would do back in '65! This car was in a catastrophic flood. The engine was full of water and mud. After some clean up, the engine ran decently so it was not immediately rebuilt!) The engine is now rebuilt with pocket ported heads, gasket matched intake and exhaust, 2.5" single exhaust w turbo muffler and ram air system.
'65/6 were pivotal years at GM for new big block engines from the various divisions. GM maintained a no big block rule for non-full size cars. I've been trying for years to find specific information that says when GM changed to allow it's divisions intermediate cars have the big blocks for an option. The '64/5 Pontiac GTO is credited for breaking this rule, factory made with their 389. I've found word that there were 210 '64/5 Malibus made with the Chevy 396. This number supports my belief that the big block engine rule was changed late in the '65 model year. For this reason, the '65 Rambler Marlin equipped with the Rambler 327 was rather a good match for most of it's competition, contrary to what most biased non-enthusiasts like to say. Most of the Rambler Marlin's competition, such as the GM intermediates were equipped with similar aging engine designs having a similar displacement and power rating, however AMC offered a three speed automatic or a five speed manual in contrast to the GMC two speed or no overdrive four speed transmission choices. Studebaker also offered an overdrive manual trans with their 289 V8.
1965 AMC Rambler Marlin
The Rambler Marlin was an image change car for AMC who the mainstream public generally regarded as a car maker of low tech, sluggish economy cars with dull unimaginative styling. The Marlin automobile idea draws from a variety of inspirations AMC was experiencing. AMC's Kelvinator appliance division enjoyed good success in the European market. Ever since the demise of the Nash Healey amidst the theatrical race track fireball crashes of several magnesium bodied gull wing Mercedes Benz sports cars, the turn to "the only race we're interested in is the human race" advertising slogan had prevailed. This corporate personality fell out of favor after the paradoxical reintroduction of the '54/7 Nash Rambler as a slightly restyled, open wheel well compact model named Rambler American; with this car, made in '58/9 and '60, AMC outsold Chrysler during a mild economic depression. After that, the AMC line of cars seemed a haunting reminder of bad times. The sixties resumed with economic confidence. The flathead six powered, fifties styled Ramblers quickly fell into derision. AMC needed some way to take up where it had left off with the Nash Healey. Alluding to their trans Atlantic enterprises; the success of the Nash Healey and Kelvinator, AMC chose the Marlin image, the fish itself suggesting sleek power and the trans Atlantic migratory route. In other words, the Marlin was to make a big splash for the return cycle of sporty cars from AMC.
The Marlin is probably the best example of an AMC product that is commonly derided by non-enthusiasts, having it's unique baggage full of recycled, discretely plaigerized information smears. This group of rotten sayings that stagnates in Marlin literature traces to the disinformation wars in the US auto industry used to put the smaller makes out of business and is the most ugly feature about the car. Comparing the Marlin to the Ford Mustang is proof in itself that certain sub-entities of Ford berated AMC. The absurdity is like comparing the Ford Fairlane to the Rambler American; dissimilar size categories. Another rotten saying kicking sand in the face of every Marlin owner is the one about how ugly the car is for having ill proportions. Surely this is for lack of seeing the car in person and viewing poorly taken photographs. For so long now virtually no writers have given AMC the credit for their incredible artfullness to make an automobile that actually resembles it's name; the profile of the car models the profile of a fish! Any auto body worker knows what a "sail panel" is. A Marlin does not have a long bill like the Biblically "unclean" (no scales) Swordfish. The car version also features a "longitudinal line" plus other similarities, even the length of the car models the length of actual Marlins known to exist in the ocean.
Annoying to me, nearly all Marlin information makes no mention of the influence that Chryslers Turbine Program had on AMC. Three cars from AMC show they were bracing for Chrysler's full production turbine powered car; the '64 Rambler American, '65 Classic Typhoon and '65 Marlin. Each of these cars hint's about the '64 Turbine Car. The Marlin has much similarity to the '56/7 Chrysler Norseman; a member of Chrysler's turbine car program. Realizing this, one may find a whole alternative story surrounding the Marlin in US auto history; the story of alternative automotive engines, accepting the fact that the V8 engine design began as an alternative to the former tried and true inline eights. In this picture, only the Marlin remains prudent when it is displayed to fit in between the '48 Tucker, '56/7 Norseman, '66 Dodge Charger (was to be the full production turbine powered car) and the '67 Ford Torino and then Talledega. The idea behind the large displacement V8 engines coupled to two speed automatic transmissions during the sixties was to provide volumnous, seamless jet like power, not feeling a small engine wind itself up through many gear shifts. The chase was to have airplane technology charisma. The huge displacement V8's of sixties were alternative engines for this reason.
Marlin Territory
Poor Sales?
"The Marlin suffered from poor sales" is simply parroted disinformation. AMC had a certain capacity to assemble what they called a "slow build" car. The '68-'70 Javelin/AMX parallels the Classic/Marlin marketing strategy; put one or two attention getter 'slow build" cars in every dealer to sell the more profitable full production models. (The production figures for the Classic/Marlin are nearly mirrored by the Javelin/AMX.) AMC issued dealer bulletins with instructions "How to sell Classics with the Marlin". In other words, the Marlin was a limited production sales tool, like the AMX.
